As in former times, this stone still serves as a lintel in the artificial entrance of a natural cave near the monuments of the court of the Connaught kings in Cruachu. The entrance, "a drystone masonry porch in the style of a souterrain" according to Macalister, CIIC, is concealed underneath the first path turning to the South-East from the road after passing by the so-called "Rath na-dtarbh" in South-Western direction.
According to Ferguson, PRIA 9, 1867, 160 f., the "spot" is "marked with the name Owneygat, that is, the Cat's Cave" within "the townland of Glenballythomas" (Umhaid na gcat according to a ms. 14 F. 8, p. 191 ff., deposited in the Library of the Academy; "Queen Meave's treasure-house" in OI, 56), and it is situated "310 yards ("30 yards westward" in OI) north-west of the ancient sepulchral enclosure called Relig-na-ree" which is believed to have been the cemetery of the Cruachu kings. According to the same author's article about "Cemeteries" (PRIA 15, 1872), 117, "about three hundred yards to the south-east of Relig-na-ree stands the pillar-stone thought to indicate the grave of Dathi, the last Pagan Monarch of Ireland, who is recorded to have been buried at Rathcroghan A.D. 428". Cf. Ferguson, PRIA 15, 1872, 114-118 for details about the whole site as well as figures showing the Relig-na-ree and Dathi's pillar; the first description can, according to PRIA 9, 1867, 160, be found in a note to O'Donovan's translation of the "Annals of the Four Masters", for A.D. 1223.
The site was visited by Ferguson on the 30.9.1864 (PRIA 9, 1867, 161) who "observed" (for the first time?) two "inscriptions in the Ogham character" in the souterrain. According to him, the cave was surrounded by "the remains of a tumulus of about twenty yards in diameter" at that time (cp. his Fig. 1, where "A" marks the entrance as shown in his Figs. 4 and 5). Today, the tumulus no longer exists, the entrance being hidden underneath the path mentioned (cp. photograph 9). If compared with Ferguson's description, the souterrain cannot be entered to the same extent as in his days now because it has filled up with mud (cp. photograph 6). The present stone (numbered 12 by Macalister, CIIC), is still in reach, however.
An exact reading was not possible under the given circumstances when the cave was visited in 1978; in 1996, conditions were much better because the afternoon sunlight fell just into the entrance.
No size is given by Macalister, CIIC.
The stone is not included in Macalister, Epig.
Published illustrations:
- Ferguson, PRIA 9, 1867, 162 ff. (three woodcuts, no. 1, 2, 3, showing the structure of the souterrain, one draft showing the presumed original shape of the stone, and one sketch of the inscription);
- Macalister, CIIC (draft).
Outer angle, west to east | inner edge, west to east:
FRAICCI | MAQI MEDFFI
"(The stone of) [Fraic?] son of Medf."
Given the "generally observed rule that these inscriptions read from bottom to top, and from left to right", there is "no reasonable doubt that" the line starting with MAQI "contains the patronymic, and the line on the opposite side the name, of the person commemorated". Of FRAICCI, -R-CCI "are free from doubt". Ferguson was able "to examine the whole under surface and edge, and to state that no further inscribed marks exist upon it" (164).
The author wonders whether the "two ribbed projections, separated by shallow grooved indentations" he found on "the inner edge, at the eastern end" (i.e. after the letters read "FFI") might have resulted from intentional "preparation with the tool". He compares "similar indentations" on a stone from New Grange and one of the "Ogham inscribed stones in the Academy's Lapidarian Museum, No. 5" {142: Ballineanig}. "These indentations, whatever object they may have had, appear to indicate that this is the upper end of the stone, and raise a probable conjecture that it originally stood upright."
83.: Outer arris:
FRAICCI / FREOCCI
"There is nothing to indicate how these vowel equivalents are to be divided." - "Fraic or Freoc (is) a proper name, which in the Tain bo Fraich has local associations with Rathcroghan.
84.: Inner arris:
MAQIMEDFFI
Maqi Medffi
"The over-line digits forming the D and the under-line digits forming the first F are in some degree apposited, and might be taken as GB, Megbfi, but I make no doubt but this slight overlap indicates no real modification of the text .." - "The name of Medff .. is even harder to dissociate from an historical identity .. Medff may be masculine as well as feminine."
VRAICCI MAQI MEDVVI
"Assuming the correctness of the published copy of Rathcroghan I, which I have not seen", this "is certainly `of Fraech, son of Medb'; it is highly improbable, though, that the title hero from Tÿin B¢ Fro¡ch could be meant here.
MEDVVI
This may be taken as an example for "Ogham V after d (aspirate)" becoming MS. b (aspirate), cf. nom. Medb (masc.) L.Arm. So doubtless after l, n, r".
VRAICCI MAQI MEDVVI
The Inscription is of the "up-up" type. -DV- was "cut carelessly, so as to overlap". - Macalister here prefers to "abstain from speculation as to whether" MEDVVI could mean "Medb, the queen of Connachta, whose traditions are linked so closely with this site".
VRAICCI MAQI MEDVVI
The inscription is preserved complete; it belongs to an early period.
Reading Gippert (5.4.1996):
"Outer" angle 
"west" to 
"east" -
"Inner" angle 
"west" to 
"east":
(V)RAICC(I) [||] MAQI MEDVV(I)
(é)òñâåäîìîì(åä) [||] ïâîíåäæïåã(ìé)é(åä)
(ç)ççïïïïïâæââââ(â) [||] ïâëëëëëâââââïââââëïç(ç)æççç(âââââ)
The stone would have to be taken off the cave in order to finally decide whether the inscription was really intended to read up-up and contains no Ogham on the "top" edge; cp. the Cloonmorris case {2}. The angle containing (V)RAICCI is the one directed outward. V1 is irregularly shaped like a vowel score; this may be due to a later added fissure. - The arrangement of DV in MEDVV[I is indeed remarkable, as Macalisterobserved. As against his suggestion of "carelessness", we have to note that the distance between E and V is just the same as the distance between the vowel notches of E and the V strokes; (cp. fig. 5); we might therefore rather think of the D having been added later, either as an insertion into an original *MEVVI or as a correction of a misspelt *MELVI. The latter possibility is suggested by the fact that the third stroke of the first V in the name is much shorter than the V1,2 and does not reach the angle so that it is doubtful by itself.
Additional literature:
- JRSAI 28, 1898, 230; 409: Rhys.
Last changes of this record: 15.04.97
Copyright Jost Gippert, Frankfurt a/M 1996. No parts of this document may be republished in any form without prior permission by the copyright holder. 
